4.7 Article

An investigation on the heat transfer characteristics of nanofluids in flow boiling by molecular dynamics simulations

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.120338

Keywords

Nanofluids; Flow boiling; Suspended and deposited nanoparticles; Molecular dynamics simulation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51876027, 51806028, 51806029, 51476019]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [DUT19JC09, DUT20JC21]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Molecular dynamics simulation is employed to investigate the heat transfer characteristics of nanofluids in flow boiling. A nanofluids model consisting of both suspended and deposited nanoparticles is established to investigate the mechanisms of nanoparticles in improving the heat transfer of flow boiling. The effects of driving force (i.e. flow velocity) and heating temperature on the heat transfer of flow boiling are analyzed. Results show that both flow velocity and heating temperature have an effect on the heat transfer of flow boiling at lower heating temperature. While with an increase in the heating temperature, the heat flux depends on the higher heating temperature extensively. Furthermore, compared with the base fluid, the heat transfer is enhanced by nanofluids, and the enhancement ratio in flow boiling (F=0) is higher than that in pool boiling (F=0). A higher frequency of bubble nucleation in nanofluids enhances the thermal convection at the near-surface region. Moreover, the surface wettability is improved by the deposited nanoparticles to increase the efficiency of heat transfer between the surface and the liquid. For suspended nanoparticles, their translational and rotational motions in flow boiling are much stronger than those in pool boiling, which can further enhance the heat transfer of nanofluids. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available