4.5 Review

Physical methods for the treatment of genitourinary syndrome of menopause: A systematic review

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS
Volume 153, Issue 2, Pages 200-219

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13561

Keywords

atrophy; erbium; female urogenital diseases; laser therapy; menopause; radiofrequency

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study suggests that laser and radiofrequency therapy may be promising and safe therapeutic options for genitourinary syndrome of menopause and urinary incontinence. However, further randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm the strength of the evidence before generalizing the findings.
Background Genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) negatively affects sexual function and quality of life. Techniques like laser and radiofrequency are being used to manage GSM, particularly in women with contraindications for hormone therapy. Objectives To verify whether the physical methods of laser and radiofrequency can be recommended as safe and effective options for the treatment of GSM/urinary urgency or incontinence in pre- and postmenopausal women. Search strategy Databases were comprehensively searched using combinations of the following keywords in any language: postmenopause; genitourinary syndrome of menopause; vaginal atrophy; radiofrequency; and laser. Selection criteria Full articles of case-control, cross-sectional, cohort, randomized clinical trials, and quasi-randomized or controlled clinical trials were included. Data collection and analysis All authors independently evaluated the design of the studies for quality of reporting, risk of bias, and quality of evidence. Main results Of the included 49 studies, 37 were on the CO2 laser, 10 on the Erbium laser, and two on radiofrequency. Conclusions Laser and radiofrequency therapy could be promising and safe therapeutic options for GSM/urinary incontinence. However, the study findings cannot be generalized until new randomized clinical trials are performed that confirm the strength of the evidence. This review has been registered with PROSPERO: CRD42020141913.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available