4.7 Article

The global burden of chronic hepatitis B virus infection: comparison of country-level prevalence estimates from four research groups

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages 560-569

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyaa253

Keywords

Hepatitis B; viral-hepatitis elimination; prevalence; disease burden; infectious diseases; modelling; indicator; monitoring; sub-Saharan Africa

Funding

  1. Imperial College Medical Research Council Doctoral Training Partnership
  2. UK Medical Research Council
  3. Department for International Development (DFID) under the MRC/DFID Concordat agreement [MR/R015600/1]
  4. National Institute for Health Research-Imperial Biomedical Research Centre
  5. MRC [MR/R015600/1, 1974917] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Comparing different sources of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection prevalence estimates reveals consistent global distribution trends, with larger discrepancies observed in sub-Saharan African countries and children under 5 years old. These variations may stem from factors such as data sources, modeling methods, and age distribution.
Background: Progress towards viral hepatitis elimination goals relies on accurate estimates of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infection prevalence. We compared existing sources of country-level estimates from 2013 to 2017 to investigate the extent and underlying drivers of differences between them. Methods: The four commonly cited sources of global-prevalence estimates, i.e. the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Schweitzer et al., the World Health Organization (WHO) and the CDA Foundation, were compared by calculating pairwise differences between sets of estimates and assessing their within-country variation. Differences in underlying empirical data and modelling methods were investigated as contributors to differences in sub-Saharan African estimates. Results: The four sets of estimates across all ages were comparable overall and agreed on the global distribution of HBV burden. The WHO and the CDA produced the most similar estimates, differing by a median of 0.8 percentage points. Larger discrepancies were seen in estimates of prevalence in children under 5 years of age and in sub-Saharan African countries, where the median pairwise differences were 2.7 percentage and 2.4 percentage points for all-age prevalence and in children, respectively. Recency and representativeness of included data, and different modelling assumptions of the age distribution of HBV burden, seemed to contribute to these differences. Conclusion: Current prevalence estimates, particularly those from the WHO and the CDA based on more recent empirical data, provide a useful resource to assess the population-level burden of chronic HBV-infection. However, further seroprevalence data in young children are needed particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. This is a priority, as monitoring progress towards elimination depends on improved knowledge of prevalence in this age group.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available