4.5 Article

Factors Affecting Customer Analytics: Evidence from Three Retail Cases

Journal

INFORMATION SYSTEMS FRONTIERS
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages 493-516

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10796-020-10098-1

Keywords

Customer analytics; Retail analytics; Customer segmentation; Visit segmentation; Business analytics; Customer behavior

Funding

  1. European Research Council under the H2020 project Transforming Transport [731932]
  2. Science Foundation Ireland [13/RC/2094]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The abundance of customer behavioral data has changed the design and application of customer analytics systems and methods. The term "visit segmentation" and a new approach have been introduced to improve segmentation results. Attention to factors such as input data, application context, and relevant requirements is crucial for reliable segmentation and improved retail decisions.
The abundance of customer behavioral data alters the design and application of customer analytics systems and approaches. Segmentation is a common customer analytics practice, but researchers highlight that traditional segmentation approaches are not enough. We coin the term visit segmentation and devise a visit segmentation approach. When designing or applying a new information system or approach, it is important to consider factors related to the input data, the application context, the users, and all the relevant requirements. Considering the literature, this paper identifies such factors that affect customer analytics approaches and systems. We explore how these factors affect segmentation through applying our segmentation approach to three heterogeneous retailers, e.g., the products' variety a shopper purchases in each visit seems to be crucial to the segmentation. The more attention data analysts and designers pay to these factors, the more reliable segmentation results they will get and, thus, improved retail decisions are expected.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available