4.6 Article

A Semiempirical Method for the Estimation of High-Pressure (Solvent plus Polymer) Phase Boundaries in the Solution Polymerization Process

Journal

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
Volume 60, Issue 1, Pages 697-718

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c04108

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Sasol Pty (Ltd.)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A simple method has been developed to predict the liquid-liquid, vapor-liquid, and vapor-liquid-liquid boundaries of solvent-polymer systems in the solution process. This method shows good results when applied to a wide range of systems containing different solvent combinations and nonaromatic hydrocarbon polymers. The predictions of lower critical end point temperatures and pressures, as well as the effects of ethylene and comonomer addition, show accurate results with relatively low average absolute deviations.
A simple method to predict the liquid-liquid (LL), vapor-liquid (VL), and vapor-liquid-liquid (VLL) boundaries of (solvent + polymer) systems found in the solution process is developed with theoretical justification. The method is developed using the (solvent + LLDPE) data of only two polymers and applied to the (solvent + polymer) data of 276 different systems containing 65 different solvent combinations (up to five solvent constituents) and 69 different nonaromatic hydrocarbon polymers with predominantly linear backbones. For data sets of interest to the solution process, lower critical end point (LCEP) temperatures and pressures can be estimated with average absolute deviations (AADs) of 4 K and 0.2 MPa, respectively. The effects of ethylene and/or comonomer addition and nitrogen addition are accurately predicted (VL/VLL: AAD = 0.2 MPa, n = 1084; LL: AAD = 0.5 MPa, n = 1115). Good results are obtained when extending the results of pure solvents to commercial-grade solvents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available