4.7 Article

PMSM Design for Achieving a Target Torque-Speed-Efficiency Map

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY
Volume 69, Issue 12, Pages 14448-14457

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2020.3040313

Keywords

Permanent magnet machines; design optimization; design tools; magnetic losses; finite element analysis

Funding

  1. Generalitat de Catalunya [2018 DI 004, 2017SGR0967]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [TRA2016-80472-R]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During the last years, the requirements for a fast and reliable design of electrical machines by applying optimization methods using finite element analysis (FEA), has become a subject of study. Due to their capabilities, permanent magnet synchronous machines (PMSMs) have become the preference choice for many applications, including electric vehicles (EVs) propulsion, water-pumping, robotics, or renewable power generation among others. This paper presents a novel methodology for designing and optimizing PMSMs using the torque-speed-efficiency map. The design-optimization algorithm requires as input, the torque-speed-efficiency map of the target motor, to define the required performance for the given application. The objective is to find the motor geometry which better approximates the target torque-speed-efficiency map. The PMSM is evaluated by using magneto-static FEA combined with direct-quadrature (d-q) electrical modeling, thus greatly reducing the computational burden when compared to conventional time-dependent FEA methods. The magneto-static FEA method calculates iron losses taking into account the magnetic flux density harmonic content by applying a time-space conversion approach. The design-optimization process takes into account the control strategy as well as losses separation, which is validated by using the public experimental data of the Toyota Prius and Camry PMSMs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available