4.7 Article

Parameterized Strain Estimation for Vascular Ultrasound Elastography With Sparse Representation

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING
Volume 39, Issue 12, Pages 3788-3800

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2020.3005017

Keywords

Strain; Discrete cosine transforms; Estimation; Optical flow; Microsoft Windows; Cost function; Computational modeling; Affine-based model strain; discrete cosine transform; high temporal and spatial resolutions; optical flow; sparse representation; ultrasound elastography; principal strains

Funding

  1. Collaborative Health Research Program of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [CHRP-462240-2014]
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [CPG-134748]
  3. Quebec Bioimaging Network of the Fonds de Recherche Quebec Sante (Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Montreal)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ultrasound vascular strain imaging has shown its potential to interrogate the motion of the vessel wall induced by the cardiac pulsation for predicting plaque instability. In this study, a sparse model strain estimator (SMSE) is proposed to reconstruct a dense strain field at a high resolution, with no spatial derivatives, and a high computation efficiency. This sparse model utilizes the highly-compacted property of discrete cosine transform (DCT) coefficients, thereby allowing to parameterize displacement and strain fields with truncated DCT coefficients. The derivation of affine strain components (axial and lateral strains and shears) was reformulated into solving truncated DCT coefficients and then reconstructed with them. Moreover, an analytical solution was derived to reduce estimation time. With simulations, the SMSE reduced estimation errors by up to 50% compared with the state-of-the-art window-based Lagrangian speckle model estimator (LSME). The SMSE was also proven to be more robust than the LSME against global and local noise. For in vitro and in vivo tests, residual strains assessing cumulated errors with the SMSE were 2 to 3 times lower than with the LSME. Regarding computation efficiency, the processing time of the SMSE was reduced by 4 to 25 times compared with the LSME, according to simulations, in vitro and in vivo results. Finally, phantom studies demonstrated the enhanced spatial resolution of the proposed SMSE algorithm against LSME.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available