4.8 Article

Dynamic Optimization for Copper Removal Process With Continuous Production Constraints

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages 7255-7263

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TII.2019.2943500

Keywords

Copper; Optimization; Inductors; Ions; Zinc; Trajectory; Production; Control vector parameterization (CVP); copper removal; dynamic optimization; inequality constraints; state transition algorithm (STA)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61873285]
  2. Funds for International Cooperation and Exchange of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [61860206014]
  3. Innovation-Driven Plan in Central South University [2018CX12]
  4. 111 Project [B17048]
  5. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [2018JJ3683, TII-19-0258]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The copper removal process (CRP) aims to reduce the copper ion concentration in zinc sulphate solution to a specific range by zinc addition. The satisfaction of production constraints and minimization of zinc consumption are vital but difficult to achieve. In this article, the dynamic optimization for CRP is conducted for optimal zinc control trajectory design considering constraints at least cost. First, a dynamic optimization problem with both state and control constraints is constructed for CRP. Then, a constrained dynamic optimization method is proposed, where a wavelet-based control parameterization method and a smooth penalty method are adopted. Specially, a hybrid optimization strategy is proposed to achieve a robust and efficient optimization performance. Numerical experiments are provided to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Results show that the proposed method can produce not only the optimal control trajectory with a qualified outlet ion concentration but also the less zinc consumption.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available