4.8 Article

Time Series Data-Driven Batch Assessment of Power System Short-Term Voltage Security

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages 7306-7317

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TII.2020.2977456

Keywords

Security; Power system stability; Trajectory; Estimation; Power system dynamics; Time series analysis; Thermal stability; Dynamic security region; security margin; shapelets; short-term voltage stability; time series data analytics

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFB0904500]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1766214, 51677097, TII-19-2546]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For power system dynamic security assessment (DSA), the conventional dynamic security region method is able to provide valuable information on security margins for preventive control. However, its event-based nature is likely to induce heavy computational burdens, especially in the presence of substantial presumed events. To tackle this challenging problem, this article develops an efficient time series data-driven scheme for batch DSA in a divide-and-conquer manner. First of all, with emphasis on short-term voltage stability, a novel u-shapelet (representative local trajectory)-based hierarchical clustering method is proposed to automatically divide various training cases into a handful of typical transient scenarios. Then, regressive shapelet learning is efficiently carried out to conquer individual scenarios, resulting in a group of high-precision security margin estimation models. With a desirable data-driven nature, the proposed scheme avoids time-consuming dynamic security region (DSR) characterization for each event, thereby achieving a significant speed-up for batch DSA. Test results on the realistic China Southern Power Grid illustrate its excellent performances on batch DSA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available