4.8 Article

Finite Control Set Model Predictive Control for LCL-Filtered Grid-Tied Inverter With Minimum Sensors

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS
Volume 67, Issue 12, Pages 9980-9990

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2019.2962444

Keywords

Inverters; Voltage measurement; Observers; Sensors; Capacitors; Delays; Current measurement; Control reliability; delay compensation; finite control set model predictive control (FCS-MPC); grid synchronization; LCL filter; state observer; virtual flux (VF) observer

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51561165013]
  2. Shanghai Science and Technology Commission [17040501500]
  3. National Key Research and Development Project of China [2017YFGH001164]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, finite control set model predictive control (FCS-MPC) has been successfully applied in the grid-tied inverter with the LCL filter. However, to achieve active damping and grid synchronization, many sensors are required, increasing cost, and complexity. In addition, a considerable computational delay should be addressed when it is experimentally implemented, which may degrade the performance of the overall system. In order to reduce the number of sensors, eliminate the computational delay, and enhance the control reliability of the system, a novel FCS-MPC strategy with merely grid-injected current sensors is proposed, which contains four compositions: virtual flux observer, state observer, delay compensation, and FCS-MPC algorithm based on estimations. A 3-kW/3-phase/110-V experimental platform is established to validate that utilizing the proposed observations-based control method with only grid-injected current sensors is capable to obtain satisfactory performance of grid synchronization and high-quality grid-injected current both under balanced and unbalanced grid voltage condition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available