4.8 Article

Cascading Failure Modeling for Circuit Systems Using Impedance Networks: A Current-Flow Redistribution Approach

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS
Volume 68, Issue 1, Pages 632-641

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2020.2967672

Keywords

Cascading failure; current-flow redistribution factor; impedance network; tolerance parameter

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51675025]
  2. Academic Excellence Foundation of BUAA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article introduces an impedance network model to characterize the cascading failure of circuits, proposes a current-flow redistribution method to determine the effects of failed components on remaining components, and introduces a health confidence value to assess the health status of the circuit.
The collapse of circuits is usually a cascading failure rather than a simple failure event. It is usually difficult to model this kind of failure due to the complex structural and functional coupling. In this article, the impedance network is introduced as a prototypical model for characterizing the cascading failure of the circuit. A current-flow redistribution approach is proposed to analyze the cascading failure mechanisms of the circuits. Specific current-flow redistribution factors for two typical failure modes, i.e., the open circuit and short circuit, are put forward to determine the effect of the failed component on the remaining components. A health confidence value is further introduced to assess the health status of the impedance network. Then, a simulation framework for cascading failure propagation is proposed to capture the dynamic failure process. Finally, an example is presented to show the cascading failure behavior. The proposed model is also validated by comparing the obtained results with those of the SPICE software simulation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available