4.6 Article

Modeling and Control of Tower Cranes With Elastic Structure

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCST.2019.2961639

Keywords

Cranes; Poles and towers; Load modeling; Dynamics; Strain; Damping; Control design; Anti-sway control; flatness-based feedforward; modeling; Ritz discretization; structural dynamics; tower crane

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a dynamic model of top-slewing tower cranes considering structural elasticity, as well as a control structure design for anti-sway, which consists of a nonlinear feedforward controller and a gain scheduled linear quadratic regulator. Experimental results with a full-scale tower crane validate the model accuracy and effectiveness of the proposed anti-sway control concept.
Due to their lightweight construction, large tower cranes are prone to structural vibrations that pose a major challenge for load sway damping control design and are the main reason for the lack of anti-sway systems in most modern tower cranes. Since neglecting the structural elasticity for feedback control design can lead to instability or poor performance, a detailed dynamic model is required that takes the structural elasticity into account. This contribution presents a control-oriented dynamic model of top-slewing tower cranes as a flexible multibody system assuming jib and tower as nonuniform Euler-Bernoulli beams and taking into account the dynamic couplings between steel structure, load motion, system drives, and rope. The distributed deformations are discretized using the Ritz method. For active sway damping, a two-degree-of-freedom control structure is designed consisting of a nonlinear flatness-based feedforward controller and a gain scheduled linear quadratic regulator. Experimental results at a full-scale tower crane validate the model accuracy and demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed anti-sway control concept.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available