The Truth About 2-Level Transition Elimination in Bang-Bang PAM-4 CDRs

Reception of 4-level pulse amplitude modulation (PAM-4) requires a clock and data recovery (CDR) circuit, typically implemented by a PLL-like structure. An essential block in such a CDR is the phase detector which should detect whether the recovered clock leads or lags the incoming data edges. In typical implementations an incoming data edge is detected by sensing whether the incoming waveform crosses a data threshold level. However, there is some ambiguity in detecting the incoming data edge because PAM-4 modulation has 3 thresholds. If the waveform crosses multiple threshold levels, the level crossings will occur at different time instants due to the finite rise/fall time of the incoming waveform. In this work, we first analyze qualitatively and quantitatively CDR systems that use one threshold for phase adjustment. Here, eliminating the 2-level transitions decreases the amount of jitter injected by the phase detector. However, the available transitions for phase adjustment are also reduced, which lowers the CDR's robustness. Secondly, for CDR systems using three thresholds, a combination of two techniques: majority voting and elimination of 2-level transitions is investigated. We prove that in this case, the elimination of 2-level transitions is not needed and even gives a worse performance when implemented.

Automated summary

This study examines CDR systems utilizing different thresholds for phase adjustment, finding that eliminating 2-level transitions can reduce jitter injected by the phase detector, but also decreases system robustness. For CDR systems with three thresholds, the combination of majority voting and elimination of 2-level transitions can improve performance.