4.7 Article

On the Equivalence of Youla, System-Level, and Input-Output Parameterizations

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL
Volume 66, Issue 1, Pages 413-420

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TAC.2020.2979785

Keywords

Linear systems; Optimal control; Electronic mail; Decentralized control; Adaptive control; Closed loop systems; Task analysis; Quadratic invariance (QI); stabilizing controller; system-level synthesis (SLS); Youla parameterization

Funding

  1. NSF [1553407]
  2. AFOSR
  3. ONR
  4. ERC
  5. EPSRC [EP/M002454/1]
  6. Directorate For Engineering
  7. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys [1553407] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. EPSRC [EP/M002454/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The article presents explicit affine mappings among Youla, system-level, and input-output parameterizations, and two direct implications of these affine mappings.
A convex parameterization of internally stabilizing controllers is fundamental for many controller synthesis procedures. The celebrated Youla parameterization relies on a doubly coprime factorization of the system, while the recent system-level and input-output parametrizations require no doubly coprime factorization, but a set of equality constraints for achievable closed-loop responses. In this article, we present explicit affine mappings among Youla, system-level, and input-output parameterizations. Two direct implications of these affine mappings are: 1) any convex problem in the Youla, system-level, or input-output parameters can be equivalently and convexly formulated in any other one of these frameworks, including the convex system-level synthesis; 2) the condition of quadratic invariance is sufficient and necessary for the classical distributed control problem to admit an equivalent convex reformulation in terms of either Youla, system-level, or input-output parameters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available