4.7 Article

Orientation Estimation Through Magneto-Inertial Sensor Fusion: A Heuristic Approach for Suboptimal Parameters Tuning

Journal

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages 3408-3419

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2020.3024806

Keywords

Magnetic separation; Sensor fusion; Optical filters; Magnetometers; Accelerometers; Filtering algorithms; MIMU; filter parameter; wearable sensors; gait analysis

Funding

  1. Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking through the European Union [DoMoMEA POR FESR 2014/2020]
  2. [MOBILISE-D 820820]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article presents a method for suboptimally setting input parameters of sensor fusion algorithms by exploiting the assumption that two rigidly connected MIMUs should show no orientation difference during motion. The approach was successfully validated and tested on 18 different experimental conditions, showing consistent results with the trial-and-error method in most cases.
Magneto-Inertial Measurement Units (MIMUs) are a valid alternative tool to optical stereophotogrammetry in human motion analysis. The orientation of a MIMU may be estimated by using sensor fusion algorithms. Such algorithms require input parameters that are usually set using a trial- and- error (or grid- search) approach to find the optimal values. However, using trial- and- error requires a known reference orientation, a circumstance rarely occurring in real-life applications. In this article, we present a way to suboptimally set input parameters, by exploiting the assumption that two MIMUs rigidly connected are expected to show no orientation difference during motion. This approach was validated by applying it to the popular complementary filter by Madgwick et al. and tested on 18 experimental conditions including three commercial products, three angular rates, and two dimensionality motion conditions. Two main findings were observed: i) the selection of the optimal parameter value strongly depends on the specific experimental conditions considered, ii) in 15 out of 18 conditions the errors obtained using the proposed approach and the trial- and- error were coincident, while in the other cases the maximumdiscrepancy amounted to 2.5 deg and less than 1.5 deg on average.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available