4.6 Article

Quantifying habitat preference of bottom trawling gear

Journal

ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE
Volume 78, Issue 1, Pages 172-184

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsaa207

Keywords

beam trawl fishing; benthic impact; habitat preference; INLA; pulse fishing; VMS

Funding

  1. European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF)
  2. Netherlands Ministry of Agriculture, Nature, and Food Quality (LNV) [1300021172]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Continental shelves are heavily impacted by bottom trawling, affecting a quarter of wild marine species. Understanding suitable fishing grounds for bottom trawlers is crucial in marine spatial planning discussions, and studying the habitat preference of fisheries is important for supporting fisheries and evaluating benthic impacts.
Continental shelves around the world are subject to intensive bottom trawling. Demersal fish assemblages inhabiting these shelves account for one-fourth of landed wild marine species. Increasing spatial claims for nature protection and wind farm energy suppresses, however, the area available to fisheries. In this marine spatial planning discussion, it is essential to understand what defines suitable fishing grounds for bottom trawlers. We developed a statistical methodology to study the habitat preference of a fishery, accounting for spatial correlation naturally present in fisheries data using high-resolution location data of fishing vessels and environmental variables. We focused on two types of beam trawls to target sole using mechanical or electrical stimulation. Although results indicated only subtle differences in habitat preference between the two gear types, a clear difference in spatial distribution of the two gears was predicted. We argue that this change is driven by both changes in habitat preference as well as a change in target species distribution. We discuss modelling of fisheries' habitat preference in light of marine spatial planning and as support in benthic impact assessments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available