4.6 Review

The ups and downs of hydropeaking: a Canadian perspective on the need for, and ecological costs of, peaking hydropower production

Journal

HYDROBIOLOGIA
Volume 849, Issue 2, Pages 421-441

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-020-04480-y

Keywords

Hydro-generation; Peaking; Ecosystem; Mitigation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hydropeaking is a method of hydropower operation that varies electricity generation based on sub-daily changes in flow. While it provides flexibility for energy grid stability, it also has ecological consequences that need to be considered and mitigated.
Hydropeaking refers to the mode of hydropower dam operation where sub-daily changes in flow are used to vary the generation of electricity in accordance with demand. A typical pattern produces maximum power during the day (i.e., the peak), and minimal power at night. Hydropeaking is considered necessary to stabilize the energy grid since it is the only reliably flexible method of producing electricity besides fossil fuels. With the planned phase-out of traditional coal-fired electricity production across Canada by 2030, and the increased reliance on intermittent wind and solar generation, the flexibility of hydropeaking will assume an increased importance. However, hydropower generation comes with costs; hydropeaking in particular is considered one of the most ecologically harmful modes of operation since downstream biota are subjected to flows that deviate greatly from typical natural flow regime patterns. The ecological effects of hydropeaking have been examined in a growing body of literature, but mitigation options do exist that include dam operational and/or structural modifications. This paper will explore the importance of hydropeaking in the Canadian electricity system, the ecological consequences of flexible hydropower, and mitigation options that could potentially strike a balance between meeting Canadian energy needs and minimizing ecosystem impacts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available