4.4 Article

Determinants of outcome impact of vein of Marshall ethanol infusion when added to catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: A secondary analysis of the VENUS randomized clinical trial

Journal

HEART RHYTHM
Volume 18, Issue 7, Pages 1045-1054

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.01.005

Keywords

Catheter ablation; Ethanol; Mitral isthmus; Persistent atrial fibrillation; Vein of Marshall

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Heart Lung and Blood Institute [NIH/NHLBI R01HL115003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effectiveness of VOM ethanol infusion in catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation is associated with achieving perimitral conduction block and procedural volume. VOM ethanol infusion has a greater impact on ablation outcomes when successful perimitral block is achieved and procedures are conducted in high-volume centers.
BACKGROUND The Vein of Marshall Ethanol for Untreated Persistent AF (VENUS) trial demonstrated that adding vein of Marshall (VOM) ethanol infusion to catheter ablation (CA) improves ablation outcomes in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). There was significant heterogeneity in the impact of VOM ethanol infusion on rhythm control. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to assess the association between outcomes and (1) achievement of bidirectional perimitral conduction block and (2) procedural volume. METHODS The VENUS trial randomized patients with persistent AF (N = 343) to CA combined with VOM ethanol or CA alone. The primary outcome (freedom from AF or atrial tachycardia [AT] lasting longer than 30 seconds after a single procedure) was analyzed by 2 categories: (1) successful vs no perimitral block and (2) high (>20 patients enrolled) vs low-volume centers. RESULTS In patients with perimitral block, the primary outcome was reached 54.3% after VOM-CA and 37% after CA alone (P = .01). Among patients without perimitral block, freedom from AF/AT was 34.0% after VOM-CA and 37.0% after CA (P = .583). In high-volume centers, the primary outcome was reached in 56.4% after VOM-CA and 40.2% after CA (P = .01). In low-volume centers, freedom from AF/AT was 30.77% after VOM-CA and 32.61% after CA (P = .84). In patients with successful perimitral block from high-volume centers, the primary outcome was reached in 59% after VOM-CA and 39.1% after CA (P = .01). Tests for interaction were significant (P = .002 for perimitral block and P = .04 for center volume). CONCLUSION Adding VOM ethanol infusion to CA has a greater impact on outcomes when associated with perimitral block and performed in high-volume centers. Perimitral block should be part of the VOM procedure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available