4.2 Article

Cardiac rehabilitation program improves exercise capacity in heart transplantation recipients regardless of marginal donor factors

Journal

HEART AND VESSELS
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages 659-666

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00380-020-01735-5

Keywords

Exercise capacity; Donor factor; Knee extensor muscular strength; Heart transplantation; Peak oxygen uptake

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that cardiac rehabilitation programs can improve exercise capacity in heart transplant recipients, regardless of marginal donor factors. Changes in knee extensor muscular strength are independent predictors of changes in peak oxygen uptake.
Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is recommended to improve exercise capacity after heart transplantation (HTx); however, the effects of marginal donor factors are unclear. Forty-one recipients participated in a 3-month CR program early after HTx (mean age 39 +/- 14 years; 88% male). Patients were divided into marginal (>= 2 marginal donor factors; n = 24) and control groups (< 2 marginal donor factors; n = 17). We examined donor and recipient factors related to change in peak oxygen uptake (peak VO2) during the CR program using multiple linear regression analysis. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, although the mean age was higher in the marginal group (43 +/- 13 vs. 34 +/- 14 years, p = 0.043). Peak VO2 and knee extensor muscular strength (KEMS) improved significantly in both groups (p < 0.05), but there were no observed inter-group differences. Multiple analysis revealed change in KEMS (beta = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.023-1.01) as an independent predictor of change in peak VO2 after adjustment for recipients' age, sex, and CR attendance frequency (adjusted R-2 = 0.25, p = 0.0084), whereas marginal donor factors were not a predictor (p = 0.76). The CR program improved exercise capacity in HTx recipients regardless of marginal donor factors, suggesting that recipients of marginal donor hearts should be referred to CR programs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available