4.8 Article

Evaluating the utility of tumour mutational signatures for identifying hereditary colorectal cancer and polyposis syndrome carriers

Journal

GUT
Volume 70, Issue 11, Pages 2138-2149

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-320462

Keywords

colorectal cancer; colorectal cancer screening; tumour markers; mutations; molecular pathology

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) [GNT1125269]
  2. Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship
  3. NHMRC R.D. Wright Career Development Fellowship [GNT1125268]
  4. University of Melbourne Research at Melbourne Accelerator Program (R@MAP)
  5. NHMRC [APP1136119]
  6. Victorian Health and Medical Research Fellowship
  7. National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health [U01CA167551]
  8. Australasian Colorectal Cancer Family Registry [NCI/NIH U01 CA074778, U01/U24 CA097735]
  9. Victorian Cancer Registry, Australia
  10. Ontario Familial Colorectal Cancer Registry [U01/U24 CA074783]
  11. CCFR [C-AU-0818-01, C-AU-1014-02, C-AU-0312-01, C-AU-1013-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Assessment of mutational signatures in colorectal cancers can accurately differentiate carriers of germline pathogenic variants in MMR genes and MUTYH gene from non-carriers, indicating their potential as diagnostic and variant classification tools.
Objective Germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes and in the base excision repair gene MUTYH underlie hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) and polyposis syndromes. We evaluated the robustness and discriminatory potential of tumour mutational signatures in CRCs for identifying germline PV carriers. Design Whole-exome sequencing of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) CRC tissue was performed on 33 MMR germline PV carriers, 12 biallelic MUTYH germline PV carriers, 25 sporadic MLH1 methylated MMR-deficient CRCs (MMRd controls) and 160 sporadic MMR-proficient CRCs (MMRp controls) and included 498 TCGA CRC tumours. COSMIC V3 single base substitution (SBS) and indel (ID) mutational signatures were assessed for their ability to differentiate CRCs that developed in carriers from non-carriers. Results The combination of mutational signatures SBS18 and SBS36 contributing >30% of a CRC's signature profile was able to discriminate biallelic MUTYH carriers from all other non-carrier control CRCs with 100% accuracy (area under the curve (AUC) 1.0). SBS18 and SBS36 were associated with specific MUTYH variants p.Gly396Asp (p=0.025) and p.Tyr179Cys (p=5x10(-5)), respectively. The combination of ID2 and ID7 could discriminate the 33 MMR PV carrier CRCs from the MMRp control CRCs (AUC 0.99); however, SBS and ID signatures, alone or in combination, could not provide complete discrimination (AUC 0.79) between CRCs from MMR PV carriers and sporadic MMRd controls. Conclusion Assessment of SBS and ID signatures can discriminate CRCs from biallelic MUTYH carriers and MMR PV carriers from non-carriers with high accuracy, demonstrating utility as a potential diagnostic and variant classification tool.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available