4.4 Review

Eye rubbing in the aetiology of keratoconus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-021-05081-8

Keywords

Keratoconus; Eye rubbing; Aetiology; Risk factor; Meta-analysis; Review

Categories

Funding

  1. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [APP1187763, 1138585]
  2. Angior Family Foundation
  3. Keratoconus Australia
  4. Perpetual Impact Philanthropy grant
  5. Lions Eye Foundation Fellowship
  6. CERA Hector MacLean Scholarship
  7. Victorian Government
  8. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1138585] Funding Source: NHMRC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Eye rubbing is consistently associated with keratoconus, but current evidence is limited to a small number of case-control studies that are heterogeneous and of sub-optimal methodological quality. Further research is needed to explore the intricate relationship between eye rubbing and the induction, ongoing progression, and severity of keratoconus.
Purpose Keratoconus is a potentially blinding condition that slowly deforms the cornea in young people. Despite the increasing prevalence of keratoconus, the exact aetiology of the condition is unknown. This first systematic review examines the evidence of eye rubbing and its association with keratoconus and presents the findings of the meta-analysis. Methods Two independent reviewers searched the electronic databases for all potential articles published from 1st of January 1900 to 31st of July 2020 on eye rubbing and keratoconus. The researchers assessed the methodological quality of the studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for observational studies. The assessment for statistical heterogeneity was estimated using chi-square and I-square (I-2) tests. A p value of < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant and I-2 < 30% as homogenous. Begg funnel plot was used to interpret the asymmetry or small study effects. Results Eight case-control studies were included in this systematic review. Two studies assessed eye rubbing without odds ratios and thus were excluded. The pooled odds ratios for the six remaining studies included in the meta-analysis was 6.46 (95% CI 4.12-10.1). The study results were heterogenous (I-2 = 71.69 [95% CI 35.14-87.88]). All the studies scored moderate quality methodology on the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Begg funnel plot showed asymmetry supporting heterogeneity. Conclusion Eye rubbing showed consistent association with keratoconus. However, the current evidence is limited to only a small number of case-control studies which present as heterogeneous and of sub-optimal methodological quality. Additionally, the cause-effect temporal relationship cannot be determined. Further studies are needed to address this intricate relationship of eye rubbing and its induction, ongoing progression, and severity of keratoconus.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available