4.7 Article

NETosis Delays Diabetic Wound Healing in Mice and Humans

Journal

DIABETES
Volume 65, Issue 4, Pages 1061-1071

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db15-0863

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Cassa di Risparmio di Padova e Rovigo (Cariparo)
  2. Veneto Banca
  3. Italian Ministry of Health [GR-2010-2301676, GR-2011-02347600, RF-2013-02358024]
  4. European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes/Novartis
  5. University of Padova
  6. Strategic Project DYCENDI grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Upon activation, neutrophils undergo histone citrullination by protein arginine deiminase (PAD)4, exocytosis of chromatin and enzymes as neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), and death. In diabetes, neutrophils are primed to release NETs and die by NETosis. Although this process is a defense against infection, NETosis can damage tissue. Therefore, we examined the effect of NETosis on the healing of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). Using proteomics, we found that NET components were enriched in non healing human DFUs. In an independent validation cohort, a high concentration of neutrophil elastase in the wound was associated with infection and a subsequent worsening of the ulcer. NET components (elastase, histones, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, and proteinase-3) were elevated in the blood of patients with DFUs. Circulating elastase and proteinase-3 were associated with infection, and serum elastase predicted delayed healing. Neutrophils isolated from the blood of DFU patients showed an increased spontaneous NETosis but an impaired inducible NETosis. In mice, skin PAD4 activity was increased by diabetes, and FACS detection of histone citrullination, together with intravital microscopy, showed that NETosis occurred in the bed of excisional wounds. PAD4 inhibition by CI-amidine reduced NETting neutrophils and rescued wound healing in diabetic mice. Cumulatively, these data suggest that NETosis delays DFU healing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available