4.7 Article

Greenland Ice Sheet Mass Balance (1992-2020) From Calibrated Radar Altimetry

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 48, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2020GL091216

Keywords

climate‐ change; Greenland Ice Sheet; mass balance; radar altimetry

Funding

  1. ESA [4000119910/17/I-NB, 4000126523/10/I-NB]
  2. C3S project [ECMWF/COPERNICUS/2018/C3S_312b_Lot4_EODC]
  3. Programme for Monitoring the Greenland Ice Sheet (PROMICE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study presents the first record of Greenland Ice Sheet mass balance from 1992 to 2020 using multisatellite Ku-band altimetry. It shows that the majority of the ice sheet contribution occurred after 2003, and that 2017 was the first year in the 21st century when the GrIS was in balance within uncertainties. The 28-year radar-derived mass balance record highlights the potential of the method to provide operational mass balance estimates using multisatellite Ku-band altimetry.
We present the first 1992-2020 record of Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) mass balance derived from multisatellite Ku-band altimetry. We employ an empirical approach as an alternative detailed to radar-propagation modeling, and instead convert elevation changes observed by radar altimetry into mass changes using spatiotemporal calibration fields. This calibration field is derived from a machine learning approach that optimizes the prediction of a previously published mass balance field as a function of ice sheet variables. Our mass balance record shows a GrIS contribution of 12.1 +/- 2.3 mm sea-level equivalent since 1992, with more than 80% of this contribution occurring after 2003. Our record also suggests that the 2017 hydrological year is the first year in the 21st century which, within uncertainties, the GrIS was in balance. Overall, the 28-year radar-derived mass balance record we present highlights the potential of the method to provide operational mass balance estimates derived from multisatellite Ku-band altimetry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available