4.5 Article

Genetic Adaptation in New York City Rats

Journal

GENOME BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evaa247

Keywords

adaptation; population genetics; rodents; selective sweeps; urban evolution

Funding

  1. Simons Society of Fellows [633313]
  2. Stanford Center for Evolutionary and Human Genomics (CEHG)
  3. National Science Foundation (NSF) [DBI-1458059]
  4. NSF [DEB 1457523, MRI 1531639]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Brownrats thrive in urban environments by adapting to human resources and exploiting anthropocentric environments. Genetic analysis of brownrats in New York City compared to ancestral populations in northeast China reveals potential adaptive genes related to metabolism, diet, and behavior.
Brownrats (Rattus norvegicus) thrive in urban environments by navigating the anthropocentric environment and taking advantage of human resources and by-products. From the human perspective, rats are a chronic problem that causes billions of dollars in damage to agriculture, health, and infrastructure. Did genetic adaptation play a role in the spread of rats in cities? To approach this question, we collected whole-genome sequences from 29 brown rats from New York City (NYC) and scanned for genetic signatures of adaptation. We tested for 1) high-frequency, extended haplotypes that could indicate selective sweeps and 2) loci of extreme genetic differentiation between the NYC sample and a sample from the presumed ancestral range of brown rats in northeast China. We found candidate selective sweeps near or inside genes associated with metabolism, diet, the nervous system, and locomotory behavior. Patterns of differentiation between NYC and Chinese rats at putative sweep loci suggest that many sweeps began after the split from the ancestral population. Together, our results suggest several hypotheses on adaptation in rats living in proximity to humans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available