4.4 Article

Genes underlying species differences in cuticular hydrocarbon production between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans

Journal

GENOME
Volume 64, Issue 2, Pages 87-95

Publisher

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/gen-2019-0224

Keywords

pheromone; cuticular hydrocarbons; species differences; Drosophila melanogaster; Drosophila simulans

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Surface chemical compounds play a crucial role in the survival and reproduction of insects, with CHCs being essential for desiccation resistance and chemical communication. Understanding the genetic basis of species variation in CHCs is important for reproductive success and isolation between species. The gene CG5946 has been identified as a new candidate locus contributing to species-specific variation in CHC profiles.
Surface chemical compounds are key components of survival and reproduction in many species. Cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) are chemical compounds produced by all insects that are used for both desiccation resistance and chemical communication, including communication related to mating. In the species pair of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans, female CHCs stimulate conspecific males to mate and repel heterospecific males. While CHCs are a critical contributor to both reproductive success within a species and isolation between species, few genes underlying species variation in CHC profiles are known. Here, we use genetic mapping of the 3rd chromosome to test a suite of candidate genes for interspecies variation in CHCs. Candidate gene CG5946 was found to be involved in species differences in the production of 7,11-heptacosadiene and 7-tricosene between D. melanogaster and D. simulans. This is therefore a new candidate locus contributing to species-specific variation in the CHC profile. In the process of mapping genes for CHCs, we also identified 29 candidate genes for the reduced survival or inviability of interspecies hybrids.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available