4.6 Article

Private payer coverage policies for ApoE-e4 genetic testing

Journal

GENETICS IN MEDICINE
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages 614-620

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-01042-4

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute (NCI)/National Human Genome Research Institute [U01 HG009599]
  2. NCI [R01 CA221870]
  3. National Institute on Aging (NIA) [NIA-K01-AG057796]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Analysis reveals that most private payers' coverage policies have a negative stance towards ApoE genetic testing, citing lack of clinical utility. Rationales for the policies include referencing guidelines or national standards, inadequate supporting data for testing, labeling testing as investigational, and belief that testing would not alter patients' clinical management.
PURPOSE: ApoE-e4 has a well-established connection to late-onset Alzheimer disease (AD) and is available clinically. Yet, there have been no analyses of payer coverage policies for ApoE. Our objective was to analyze private payer coverage policies for ApoE genetic testing, examine the rationales, and describe supporting evidence referenced by policies. METHODS: We searched for policies from the eight largest private payers (by member numbers) covering ApoE testing for late-onset AD. We implemented content analysis methods to evaluate policies for coverage decisions and rationales. RESULTS: Seven payers had policies with positions on ApoE testing. Five explicitly state they do not cover ApoE and two apply generic preauthorization criteria. Rationales supporting coverage decisions include: reference to guidelines or national standards, inadequate data supporting testing, characterizing testing as investigational, or that testing would not alter patients' clinical management. CONCLUSION: Seven of the eight largest private payers' coverage policies reflect standards that discourage ApoE testing due to a lack of clinical utility. As the field advances, ApoE testing may have an important clinical role, particularly considering that disease-modifying therapies are under evaluation by the US Food and Drug Administration. These types of field advancements may not be consistent with private payers' policies and may cause payers to reevaluate existing coverage policies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available