4.6 Article

Toward newborn screening of metachromatic leukodystrophy: results from analysis of over 27,000 newborn dried blood spots

Journal

GENETICS IN MEDICINE
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 555-561

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-01017-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 DK067859]
  2. Takeda

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrates the feasibility of newborn screening for MLD using dried blood spots, achieving nearly 100% assay specificity with a two-tier screening algorithm. Two high-risk cases were identified and confirmed through ARSA gene sequencing.
Purpose Metachromatic leukodystrophy (MLD) is a lysosomal storage disorder caused by the deficiency of arylsulfatase A (ARSA), which results in the accumulation of sulfatides. Newborn screening for MLD may be considered in the future as innovative treatments are advancing. We carried out a research study to assess the feasibility of screening MLD using dried blood spots (DBS) from de-identified newborns. Methods To minimize the false-positive rate, a two-tier screening algorithm was designed. The primary test was to quantify C16:0-sulfatide in DBS by ultraperformance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). The screening cutoff was established based on the results from 15 MLD newborns to achieve 100% sensitivity. The secondary test was to measure the ARSA activity in DBS from newborns with abnormal C16:0-sulfatide levels. Only newborns that displayed both abnormal C16:0-sulfatide abundance and ARSA activity were considered screen positives. Results A total of 27,335 newborns were screened using this two-tier algorithm, and 2 high-risk cases were identified. ARSA gene sequencing identified these two high-risk subjects to be a MLD-affected patient and a heterozygote. Conclusion Our study demonstrates that newborn screening for MLD is highly feasible in a real-world scenario with near 100% assay specificity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available