4.5 Article

A positive psychology-motivational interviewing program to promote physical activity in type 2 diabetes: The BEHOLD-16 pilot randomized trial

Journal

GENERAL HOSPITAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 68, Issue -, Pages 65-73

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2020.12.001

Keywords

Motivational interviewing; Optimism; Positive psychology; Physical activity; Type 2 diabetes

Categories

Funding

  1. American Diabetes Association [1-17-ICTS-099]
  2. National Center for Advancing Translational Science [1UL1TR002541-01]
  3. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [K23HL123607, K23HL135277]
  4. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [R21DK109313]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and impact of a novel positive psychology motivational interviewing program on promoting physical activity among inactive individuals with type 2 diabetes. Results showed positive effects on participants' physical activity and steps, and the program demonstrated good feasibility and acceptability.
Background: The majority of persons with type 2 diabetes (T2D) do not meet recommended levels of physical activity, despite clear links between physical activity and superior medical outcomes in this population. The objective of this trial was to assess the feasibility and impact of a novel 16-week combined positive psychology motivational interviewing (PP-MI) program to promote physical activity among inactive persons with T2D. Methods: This pilot randomized trial compared the 16-week, phone-delivered PP-MI intervention to an attention matched diabetes counseling condition among 70 persons with T2D and low levels of baseline moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA; <150 min/week). The primary study outcomes were feasibility (assessed via rates of session completion) and acceptability (assessed via mean participant ratings [0-10] of the ease and utility of weekly sessions). Key secondary outcomes included between-group differences in improvement in positive affect, other psychological outcomes, and accelerometer-measured physical activity, assessed using mixed effects regression models, at 16 and 24 weeks. Results: Participants completed a mean 11.0 (SD 4.4; 79%) of 14 PP-MI phone sessions, and composite mean ratings of ease/utility were 8.6/10, above our a priori benchmarks for feasibility/acceptability (70% session completion; 7.0/10 mean ratings). PP-MI participants had small to medium effect size (ES) difference improvements in MVPA (ES difference = 0.34) and steps/day (ES difference = 0.76) at 16 weeks, with sustained but smaller effects at 24 weeks (ES difference = 0.22-0.33). Conclusions: Next-step studies of this PP-MI program in T2D patients can more rigorously explore the intervention's effects on physical activity and clinical outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available