4.7 Article

Overexpressing IRS1 in Endothelial Cells Enhances Angioblast Differentiation and Wound Healing in Diabetes and Insulin Resistance

Journal

DIABETES
Volume 65, Issue 9, Pages 2760-2771

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db15-1721

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Hiroo Kaneda Scholarship, Sunstar Foundation, Japan
  2. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) Diabetes Research Center [P30DK036836]
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [26463128]
  4. NIH/NIDDK [R01 DK053105-13]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26461230, 26463128] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of enhancing insulin's actions in endothelial cells (ECs) to improve angiogenesis and wound healing was studied in obesity and diabetes. Insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS1) was overexpressed in ECs using the VE-cadherin promoter to create ECIRS1 TG mice, which elevated pAkt activation and expressions of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), Flk1, and VE-cadherin in ECs and granulation tissues (GTs) of full-thickness wounds. Open wound and epithelialization rates and angiogenesis significantly improved in normal mice and high fat (HF) diet-induced diabetic mice with hyperinsulinemia in ECIRS1 TG versus wild type (WT), but not in insulin deficient diabetic mice. Increased angioblasts and EC numbers in GT of ECIRS1 mice were due to proliferation in situ rather than uptake. GT in HF-fed diabetic mice exhibited parallel decreases in insulin and VEGF-induced pAkt and EC numbers by >50% without changes in angioblasts versus WT mice, which were improved in ECIRS1 TG mice on normal chow or HF diet. Thus, HF-induced diabetes impaired angiogenesis by inhibiting insulin signaling in GT to decrease the differentiation of angioblasts to EC, which was normalized by enhancing insulin's action targeted to EC, a potential target to improve wound healing in diabetes and obesity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available