4.7 Article

Thermogravimetric analysis and pyrolysis product characterization of municipal solid waste using sludge fly ash as additive

Journal

FUEL
Volume 281, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118572

Keywords

Pyrolysis; Municipal solid waste; Sludge fly ash; Additive; TG-FTIR; Syngas

Funding

  1. Key Program for ChinaEU International Cooperation in Science and Technology Innovation [2018YFE0117300]
  2. Shaanxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation Research Program-Shaanxi Coal Joint Funding [2019JLZ12]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

MSW pyrolysis was performed in a fixed-bed reactor at 700 degrees C and sludge fly ash (SFA) was used as an additive. Only organic fractions of MSW were considered. The yield of the products was compared under three conditions: without SFA, with 5% SFA and with 10% SFA. TG-FTIR was also performed on the single, mixed and SFA fractions of MSW to determine the kinetic parameters of the feedstock. The plastic and rubber fractions were the most useful fractions of MSW. Kinetic analysis showed that addition of SFA resulted in the reduction of the apparent activation energy (E). With SFA pyrolysis, the liquid yield decreased from 20.8% to 6.4% and the gas yield increased from 65.5% to 76.4% with 5% SFA and then, decreased to 73.2% with 10% SFA. The major active species in SFA (CaO, SiO2 and Fe2O3) greatly promoted tar cracking effect, resulting in greater gas and lower liquid yield. Addition of 5% SFA, proved to be the most feasible condition, because of higher H-2 yield, lowest char yield and better quality liquid product. Thus, concentration of SFA additive proved to be an important factor in products formation of MSW pyrolysis. The possible ecological risk valuation of heavy metals in chars showed the RI values, with 5% and 10% SFA, as 49.02 and 65.10, respectively. This work demonstrated that addition of sludge fly ash played a vital role in the pyrolysis of MSW.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available