4.7 Article

Sodium 4-styrenesulfonate functionalized nanofibers mat as 96-well plate solid-phase extraction adsorbent for quantitative determination of multiple β-agonists residues in pork samples

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 335, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127631

Keywords

Solid-phase extraction; UPLC-MS/MS; Nanofibers mat; beta-Agonists; Pork; Food safety

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81973098]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, SS/PAN NFM was prepared and applied for solid-phase extraction of seven beta-agonists residues in pork samples. The adsorption process was found to be spontaneous with high initial adsorption rate and maximum capacity. The method showed high sensitivity, good recoveries, and acceptable precision, demonstrating its practicality in preventing the hazard of beta-agonists residues.
In this work, sodium 4-styrenesulfonate functionalized polyacrylonitrile nanofibers mat (SS/PAN NFM) was firstly prepared and applied as 96-well plate solid-phase extraction adsorbent for quantitative determination of seven beta-agonists residues in pork samples. The functional modification endowed the SS/PAN NFM with superior adsorption performance for target beta-agonists. The adsorption process is spontaneous (Delta G < 0), the initial adsorption rate can reach 6.03-9.09 mg/g/min and the maximum adsorption capacity is calculated to be 48.3 mg/g at 298 K. Moreover, SS/PAN NFM can be reused for 12 times without degradation in adsorption capability. Combined with UPLC-MS/MS, the limits of detection can reach 0.006-0.24 mu g/kg, the recoveries ranged from 87.2% to 111% and the relative standard deviations of intra-day and inter-day precisions were in the scope of 1.75%-11.6% and 5.08%-13.5%, respectively. The obtained results fully demonstrated the practicability of this method in preventing the hazard of beta-agonists residues.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available