4.5 Article

Environmental impact on young children's participation in home-based activities

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY
Volume 59, Issue 4, Pages 388-394

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.13360

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [K12 HD05593]
  2. Research Open Access Publishing (ROAAP) Fund of the University of Illinois at Chicago

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AIM To test the effect of child, family, and environmental factors on young children's participation in home-based activities. METHOD Caregivers of young children were recruited using convenience and snowball sampling. Participants were 395 caregivers of children (222 males, 173 females) aged from 1 month to 5 years and 11 months. Demographic items and the home section of the Young Children's Participation and Environment Measure were administered online, followed by completion of the daily activities, mobility, and social/ cognitive domains of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory Computer Adaptive Test by telephone interview. RESULTS A structural equation model fitted the data well (comparative fit index= 0.91) and explained 31.2% of the variance in perceived environmental support and 42.5% of the variance in home involvement. Functional limitations and performance had an indirect effect on young children's participation through their effect on perceived environmental support. Specifically, fewer functional limitations and higher task performance were associated with greater environmental support, which in turn predicted higher levels of home involvement. INTERPRETATION Results suggest the importance of a young child's functional abilities and task performance on caregiver perceptions of environmental support at home, and the impact of environmental support on a child's participation in home-based activities during the early childhood period. Results warrant replication with more diverse samples to evaluate model generalizability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available