4.5 Article

Risk factors for dental caries among children with cerebral palsy in a low-resource setting

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY
Volume 59, Issue 5, Pages 538-543

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.13359

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Research Foundation of Cerebral Palsy Alliance [PG4314]
  2. Child Sight Foundation (CSF), Bangladesh
  3. NHMRC Health Early Career Fellowship [1054414]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimTo describe the oral health status and investigate factors affecting dental caries experience among children with cerebral palsy (CP) in rural Bangladesh. MethodA cross-sectional study was conducted among children with CP who are part of the Bangladesh Cerebral Palsy Register (BCPR) study. Caries experience was measured by identifying decayed, missing, and filled teeth for deciduous and permanent teeth (dmft/DMFT). Clinical periodontal index, body mass index, oral hygiene behaviour, masticatory ability, and dietary habits were recorded. CP motor types and severity of functional mobility (Gross Motor Function Classification System [GMFCS]) were assessed. ResultsOf 90 children with CP (mean age 9y 7mo, range 2-17y, 37.8% female and 62.2% male), 35% of 2 to 6 year olds, and 70% of 7 to 11 year olds (p=0.014) experienced caries (dmft+DMFT>0). The mean values (standard deviation [SD]) of dmft and DMFT were 2.46 (3.75) and 0.72 (1.79) respectively. After adjusting for age and sex, binary logistic regression analysis showed a significant relationship with dental caries for children who had quadriplegia (odds ratio [OR] 5.56, p=0.035), tooth cleaning less than one time/day (OR 0.08, p=0.016), using toothpowder or charcoal for cleaning (OR 7.63, p=0.015), and snacking between meals more than one time/day (OR 6.93, p=0.012). InterpretationEarly oral health preventive care is required for children with CP because dental caries is highly prevalent in these children.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available