4.5 Article

Toxicity of silver nanoparticles on different tissues in adult Danio rerio

Journal

FISH PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 47, Issue 2, Pages 239-249

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10695-020-00909-2

Keywords

Toxicology; Nanoparticles; Zebrafish; Acetylcholinesterase; Catalase

Funding

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study indicates that exposure to different concentrations of AgNP can significantly affect the tissues of zebrafish, leading to decreased AChE activity in the brain and muscles, as well as reduced CAT activity in the liver and gills. Additionally, morphological changes in the gills were observed.
Although silver nanoparticles (AgNP) are among the most studied nanomaterials by virtue of their broad application in many areas, little is known about their overall toxicity to aquatic organisms after their contamination of the water environment. This study aimed to analyze the effect of the exposure (96 h) to different AgNP concentrations on Danio rerio (zebrafish) tissues. AgNP were synthesized and characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), showing spherical AgNP of 30.00 +/- 16.80 nm size. The effects of different AgNP concentrations (1, 3, and 5 mu g L-1) on brain, muscle, gill, and liver tissues of zebrafish were investigated. The results show a significant decrease in brain and muscle acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity. Liver and gill catalase (CAT) activity also decreased significantly. At the highest exposure concentration, muscle AChE was more inhibited (37.3%) than brain AChE (26.4%) and gill CAT was more inhibited (67.4%) than liver CAT (51.2%). D. rerio also showed gill morphological changes such as fusion of secondary lamellae, curvature, dilated marginal channel, and epithelial lifting. This study indicates that gill CAT together with morphological studies are potential biomarkers for AgNP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available