4.3 Review

The Current State of Cervical Endoscopic Spine Surgery: an Updated Literature Review and Technical Considerations

Journal

EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages 1285-1292

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2020.1853523

Keywords

Cervical; discectomy; endoscopic; foraminotomy; laminotomy; working channel endoscope

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Endoscopic spine surgery is becoming popular, especially in the lumbar spine. This review focuses on the techniques and studies of cervical endoscopic surgery, with only a limited number of studies meeting the search criteria. While cervical endoscopic surgery shows comparable clinical outcomes to traditional MISS, there is still ongoing technical evolution to make the procedure more practical.
Introduction: Endoscopic spine surgery has become one of the representative minimally invasive spine surgeries (MISS), especially in the lumbar spine. Full-endoscopic procedures using a working channel endoscope for cervical degenerative spine disease have been reported as practical and feasible. This review aimed to summarize the updated techniques of and studies about cervical endoscopic surgery. Areas covered: An extensive search of PubMed was performed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or comparative cohort studies on the full-endoscopic cervical procedure. All the 236 articles found were screened and categorized. Only two RCTs and four cohort studies finally met the search criteria. Regarding the surgical techniques, there are four categories according to the approach method: 1) anterior endoscopic cervical discectomy (AECD); 2) anterior endoscopic cervical transcorporeal decompression (AECTcD); 3) posterior endoscopic cervical foraminotomy and discectomy (PECFD); and 4) posterior endoscopic cervical laminotomy (PECL). Expert opinion: Cervical endoscopic surgery provides comparable clinical results with MISS benefits, such as shorter operative time, less bleeding, and earlier recovery time. However, spine surgeons are not yet familiar with most of these techniques; moreover, supportive evidence is minimal. Technical evolution is still ongoing in an effort to make the procedure more practical.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available