4.6 Article

Stereoscopic PIV measurements of flow over a riblet surface at high Reynolds number

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL THERMAL AND FLUID SCIENCE
Volume 120, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2020.110246

Keywords

Turbulent boundary layer; Drag reduction; Riblet coating; Stereo-PIV

Funding

  1. European Union Seventh Framework Programme in the SEAFRONT project [614034]
  2. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [1059B191600985]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Experimental investigation on the effect of drag reducing riblets on the flow structure in a turbulent boundary layer was conducted. Results show that riblets significantly reduce turbulent structures compared to a smooth flat plate, as indicated by lower turbulent kinetic energy and Reynolds shear stress over the riblets.
The effect of drag reducing riblets on the flow structure was examined experimentally for a turbulent boundary layer at Re-theta = 9890 and riblet spacing s (+) = 13.4. Trapezoidal riblets were used, which were attached to the water tunnel wall as a coating. Force measurements were performed to quantify the amount of drag reduction. Then, the mechanism underlying this reduction was investigated by stereo-PIV measurements in the cross-stream plane. To determine the effect of the drag reducing riblets, the results were compared with the smooth flat plate. Time-averaged turbulent statistics such as turbulent kinetic energy and Reynolds shear stress were found to be lower over the riblets compared to the flat surface. Two-point correlations of the fluctuating velocity components were calculated to elucidate the average flow structure size and strength, where riblets significantly suppressed the turbulent structures. Quadrant analysis of the Reynolds shear stress was performed to assess the change in ejection and sweep events and the results were found to be in correspondence with previous works.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available