4.7 Article

Twin robotic x-ray system in small bone and joint trauma: impact of cone-beam computed tomography on treatment decisions

Journal

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages 3600-3609

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07563-5

Keywords

Cone-beam computed tomography; Extremities; Fractures; bone; Radiography

Funding

  1. Projekt DEAL
  2. Siemens Healthineers
  3. Interdisciplinary Center of Clinical Research Wurzburg, Germany [Z-2/CSP-06]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CBCT provides advantages for evaluating acute small bone and joint trauma by reliably detecting and excluding extremity fractures and related findings. Additional findings change therapy in one third of patients, suggesting substantial clinical impact.
Objectives Trauma evaluation of extremities can be challenging in conventional radiography. A multi-use x-ray system with cone-beam CT (CBCT) option facilitates ancillary 3-D imaging without repositioning. We assessed the clinical value of CBCT scans by analyzing the influence of additional findings on therapy. Methods Ninety-two patients underwent radiography and subsequent CBCT imaging with the twin robotic scanner (76 wrist/hand/finger and 16 ankle/foot/toe trauma scans). Reports by on-call radiologists before and after CBCT were compared regarding fracture detection, joint affliction, comminuted injuries, and diagnostic confidence. An orthopedic surgeon recommended therapy based on reported findings. Surgical reports (N = 52) and clinical follow-up (N = 85) were used as reference standard. Results CBCT detected more fractures (83/64 of 85), joint involvements (69/53 of 71), and multi-fragment situations (68/50 of 70) than radiography (all p < 0.001). Six fractures suspected in radiographs were ruled out by CBCT. Treatment changes based on additional information from CBCT were recommended in 29 patients (31.5%). While agreement between advised therapy before CBCT and actual treatment was moderate (kappa = 0.41 [95% confidence interval 0.35-0.47]; p < 0.001), agreement after CBCT was almost perfect (kappa = 0.88 [0.83-0.93]; p < 0.001). Diagnostic confidence increased considerably for CBCT studies (p < 0.001). Median effective dose for CBCT was 4.3 mu Sv [3.3-5.3 mu Sv] compared to 0.2 mu Sv [0.1-0.2 mu Sv] for radiography. Conclusions CBCT provides advantages for the evaluation of acute small bone and joint trauma by detecting and excluding extremity fractures and fracture-related findings more reliably than radiographs. Additional findings induced therapy change in one third of patients, suggesting substantial clinical impact.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available