Pulmonary nodule enhancement in subtraction CT and dual-energy CT: A comparison study

Objective: To compare nodule enhancement on subtraction CT iodine maps to that on dual-energy CT iodine maps using CT datasets acquired simultaneously. Methods: A previously-acquired set of lung subtraction and dual-energy CT maps consisting of thirty patients with 95 solid pulmonary nodules (>= 4 mm diameter) was used. Nodules were annotated and segmented on CT angiography, and mean nodule enhancement in the iodine maps calculated. Three radiologists scored nodule visibility with both techniques on a 4-point scale. Results: Mean nodule enhancement was higher (p < 0.001) at subtraction CT (34.9 +/- 12.9 HU) than at dualenergy CT (25.4 +/- 21.0 HU). Nodule enhancement at subtraction CT was judged more often to be highly visible for each observers (p < 0.001) with an area under the curve of 0.81. Conclusions: Subtraction CT is able to depict iodine enhancement in pulmonary nodules better than dual-energy CT.

Automated summary

Comparison between nodule enhancement on subtraction CT iodine maps and dual-energy CT iodine maps shows that subtraction CT is more effective in depicting iodine enhancement in pulmonary nodules, leading to improved visibility of nodules.