4.5 Article

An Insight into Non-Covalent Interactions on the Bicyclo[1.1.1]pentane Scaffold

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Volume 2021, Issue 7, Pages 1113-1122

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ejoc.202001564

Keywords

Bicyclo[1; 1; 1]pentane; Bioisosteres; Halogen bonding; Hydrogen bonding; Noncovalent interactions

Funding

  1. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [IvP 13/IA/1894, SFI 18/SIRG/5517]
  2. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the FET Open grant [828779]
  3. Technical University of Munich - Institute for Advanced Study through a Hans Fischer Senior Fellowship
  4. Projekt DEAL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bicyclo[1.1.1]pentane (BCP) is extensively studied as a bioisosteric component of drugs. Analysis of BCP derivatives revealed various non-covalent interactions, such as halogen bonding and N-H center dot center dot center dot O contacts, which can be useful for designing BCP analogs of drugs. Computational analysis and structure determinations provide insights into the interaction profiles of BCP derivatives with specific active sites.
Bicyclo[1.1.1]pentane (BCP) is studied extensively as a bioisosteric component of drugs. Not found in nature, this molecular unit approximates the distance of a para-disubstituted benzene which is replaced in medicines as a method of improving treatments. Predicting interactions of these drugs with specific active sites requires knowledge of the non-covalent interactions engaged by this subunit. Structure determinations and computational analysis (Hirshfeld analysis, 2D fingerprint plots, DFT) of seven BCP derivatives chosen to probe specific and directional interactions. X-ray analysis revealed the presence of various non-covalent interactions including I center dot center dot center dot I, I center dot center dot center dot N, N-H center dot center dot center dot O, C-H center dot center dot center dot O, and H-C center dot center dot center dot H-C contacts. The preference of halogen bonding (I center dot center dot center dot I or I center dot center dot center dot N) in BCP 1-4 strictly depends upon the electronic nature and angle between bridgehead substituents. The transannular distance in co-crystals 2 and 4 was longer as compared to monomers 1 and 3. Stronger N-H center dot center dot center dot O and weaker C-H center dot center dot center dot O contacts were observed for BCP 5 while the O center dot center dot center dot H interaction was a prominent contact for BCP 6. The presence of 3D BCP units prevented the pi center dot center dot center dot pi stacking between phenyl rings in 3, 4, and 7. The BCP skeleton was often rotationally averaged, indicating fewer interactions compared to bridgehead functional groups. Using DFT analysis, geometries were optimized and molecular electrostatic potentials were calculated on the BCP surfaces. These interaction profiles may be useful for designing BCP analogs of drugs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available