4.7 Article

Solving the maximum edge disjoint path problem using a modified Lagrangian particle swarm optimisation hybrid

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
Volume 293, Issue 3, Pages 847-862

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2021.01.009

Keywords

Combinatorial optimization; Large scale optimization; Metaheuristics

Funding

  1. ARC (Australian Research Council) [DP190101271]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces a new heuristic algorithm, LaPSO, which combines Lagrangian Relaxation and Particle Swarm Optimization, and incorporates a new repair heuristic called Largest Violation Perturbation (LVP) to solve the Maximum Edge Disjoint Paths (MEDP) problem. LaPSO outperforms both state-of-the-art heuristic methods and standard MIP solvers, demonstrating superior heuristic solutions and strong bounds within limited runtimes.
This paper presents a new method to solve the Maximum Edge Disjoint Paths (MEDP) problem. Given a set of node pairs within a network, the MEDP problem is the task of finding the largest number of pairs that can be connected by paths, using each edge within the network at most once. We present a heuristic algorithm that builds a hybridisation of Lagrangian Relaxation and Particle Swarm Optimisation, referred to as LaPSO. This hybridisation is combined with a new repair heuristic, called Largest Violation Perturbation (LVP). We show that our LaPSO method produces better heuristic solutions than both cur-rent state-of-the-art heuristic methods, as well as the primal solution found by a standard Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) solver within a limited runtime. Significantly, when run with a limited runtime, our LaPSO method also produces strong bounds which are superior to a standard MIP solver for the larger instances tested, whilst being competitive for the remainder. This allows our LaPSO method to prove optimality for many instances and provide optimality gaps for the remainder, making it a quasi-exact method. In this way our LaPSO algorithm, which draws on ideas from both mathematical programming and evolutionary algorithms, is able to outperform both MIP and metaheuristic solvers that only use ideas from one of these areas. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available