Total-body PET/CT using half-dose FDG and compared with conventional PET/CT using full-dose FDG in lung cancer

Purpose The purpose was to explore the effects of total-body PET/CT with half-dose F-18-FDG activity on image quality, compared with those of conventional PET/CT with clinical routine full-dose F-18-FDG in lung cancer. Methods Fifty-six primary lung cancer patients who underwent total-body PET/CT on a uEXPLORER scanner with half-dose (1.85 MBq/kg) F-18-FDG activity before treatment were retrospectively studied; among them, 28 patients were confirmed by postoperative pathologic examination and 28 patients by biopsy. After matching with the pathological study results, the other 28 patients with lung cancer who underwent surgery were selected for the full-dose (3.70 MBq/kg) group. Patients in the full-dose group were studied with a conventional uM780 PET/CT scanner. The acquisition time of the half-dose group was 15 min, split into 4-min and 2-min duration groups, which were all referred to as G15, G4 and G2, respectively. The PET/CT scanning speed in the full-dose group was 2 min/bed. Image quality was evaluated by subjective and objective analyses. The subjective analysis method was carried out with a 5-point scale (5-excellent, 1-poor). Objective analysis indicators of PET image quality included the SUVmax, SUVmean and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the liver; the SUVmax and SUVmean of the blood pool; and the SUVmax and tumour-to-background ratio (TBR) of the lesions. G15 served as the reference for G2 and G4 to test lesion detectability. Results Image quality scores in G2 (4.3 +/- 0.7) were significantly higher than those in the full-dose group (3.7 +/- 0.6) (p = 0.004). The mean and SD of the image quality scores in G4 and G15 were 4.9 +/- 0.2 and 5.0 +/- 0.0, respectively. The liver SNR in G2 was significantly higher than that in the full-dose group; the corresponding SNR were 11.7 +/- 1.5 and 8.3 +/- 1.2 (p < 0.001), respectively. The liver SNR significantly increased with the time of acquisition among G2, G4 and G15 (11.1 +/- 1.7, 15.2 +/- 3.4 and 30.5 +/- 6.0, all p < 0.05). G15 served as the reference, and all these lesions (100%) could be identified by G2 and G4. Conclusion Total-body PET/CT with half-dose F-18-FDG activity in G2 and G4 achieved comparable image quality to conventional PET/CT, and its image quality was better than that of conventional PET/CT with clinical routine full-dose F-18-FDG in lung cancer.

Automated summary

The study aimed to explore the effects of total-body PET/CT with half-dose F-18-FDG activity on image quality, and found that the image quality in the half-dose group was better than in the full-dose group. Through subjective and objective analyses, it was discovered that the image quality scores were higher in the half-dose group, and the liver signal-to-noise ratio was significantly higher as well.