Does the electrode amplification style matter? A comparison of active and passive EEG system configurations during standing and walking

It has been stated that active-transmission electrodes should improve signal quality in mobile EEG recordings. However, few studies have directly compared active- and passive-transmission electrodes during a mobile task. In this repeated measurement study, we investigated the performance of active and passive signal transmission electrodes with the same amplifier system in their respective typical configurations, during a mobile auditory task. The task was an auditory discrimination (1,000 vs. 800 Hz; counterbalanced) oddball task using approximately 560 trials (15% targets) for each condition. Eighteen participants performed the auditory oddball task both while standing and walking in an outdoor environment. While walking, there was a significant decrease in P3 amplitude, post-trial rejection trial numbers, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). No significant differences were found in signal quality between the two electrode configurations. SNR and P3 amplitude were test-retest reliable between recordings. We conclude that adequate use of a passive EEG electrode system achieves signal quality equivalent to that of an active system during a mobile task.

Automated summary

This study compared the performance of active and passive signal transmission electrodes during a mobile auditory task and found significant decreases in P3 amplitude, post-trial rejection trial numbers, and signal-to-noise ratio while walking. However, there were no significant differences in signal quality between the two electrode configurations. The study concluded that adequate use of a passive EEG electrode system can achieve signal quality equivalent to that of an active system during a mobile task.