Journal
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 51, Issue 1, Pages 180-190Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eji.202049058
Keywords
bioluminescence; COVID-19; ELISA; LuLISA; SARS-CoV-2
Categories
Funding
- Institut Pasteur
- Fondation Total
- Fondation de France
- Institut Curie Institutional fund
- DARRI
- IARP Pasteur-Carnot MI
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study conducted in Paris conurbation found that the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in active workers was approximately 11.6% in May-July 2020, higher than laboratory testing positivity rates. The research also indicated that some infected individuals did not exhibit systemic IgG responses, suggesting that the true infection rate may have reached 16.6%, with anosmia and ageusia being common symptoms of infection.
Although the COVID-19 pandemic peaked in March/April 2020 in France, the prevalence of infection is barely known. Using high-throughput methods, we assessed herein the serological response against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) of 1847 participants working in three sites of an institution in Paris conurbation. In May-July 2020, 11% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.7-12.6) of serums were positive for IgG against the SARS-CoV-2 N and S proteins, and 9.5% (95% CI: 8.2-11.0) were neutralizer in pseudo-typed virus assays. The prevalence of seroconversion was 11.6% (95% CI: 10.2-13.2) when considering positivity in at least one assay. In 5% of RT-qPCR positive individuals, no systemic IgGs were detected. Among immune individuals, 21% had been asymptomatic. Anosmia (loss of smell) and ageusia (loss of taste) occurred in 52% of the IgG-positive individuals and in 3% of the negative ones. In contrast, 30% of the anosmia-ageusia cases were seronegative, suggesting that the true prevalence of infection may have reached 16.6%. In sera obtained 4-8 weeks after the first sampling, anti-N and anti-S IgG titers and neutralization activity in pseudo-virus assay declined by 31%, 17%, and 53%, resulting thus in half-life of 35, 87, and 28 days, respectively. The population studied is representative of active workers in Paris. The short lifespan of the serological systemic responses suggests an underestimation of the true prevalence of infection.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available