4.0 Article

The effects of soil nutrient on fruit quality of 'Hayward' kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis) in Northwest China

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE
Volume 85, Issue 6, Pages 471-476

Publisher

INT SOC HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE-ISHS
DOI: 10.17660/eJHS.2020/85.6.11

Keywords

Actinidia chinensis; CCA; fruit quality; Northwest China; PCA; soil nutrient

Categories

Funding

  1. High-level Innovation Talent Program of Guizhou Province, P. R. China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Attempts had been made to provide clear insight on the performance of fruit quality and the status of soil nutrient and to explain the soil nutrient factors that predominantly affect the fruitquality of kiwifruit. The 8-year-old kiwifruit cultivar 'Hayward, which is grown in Zhouzhi County (33 degrees 42'N, 108 degrees 37'E), Shanxi Province, China, was used as the material in the study. The results of the Pearson correlation coefficient illustrated that the soil organic matter (OM) content was positively related to the soil property except the soil pH. Moreover, based on the canonical correlation analysis (CCA), the canonical variables alkaline hydrolyzable-N (AN), available iron (AFe), available boron (AB), and pH of the soil property index and the fruit quality parameters fresh weight of single fruit (FW), fruit shape index (Fl), total soluble solids (TSS), titratable acidity (TA), and total soluble sugar (SS) were selected. The best regression equation (model) indicated that the effects of the soil nutrient somewhat varied among 'Hayward' fruit quality in Northwest of China. Specifically, the FW and SS were positively related to soil AN, while FI was negatively related to soil AB and PH; TSS showed a positive correlation with soil AFe, whereas TA was positively related to soil AN(x(3)), AFe(x(6)) and PH(x(9)). Soil pH is an important factor affecting the availability of soil nutrient, and its effect on fruit quality is probably affected the absorption of soil nutrient.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available