Journal
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 106, Issue 4, Pages 555-562Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ejh.13586
Keywords
ixazomib; lenalidomide; multiple myeloma; real-world
Categories
Funding
- Celgene Co., Ltd.
- Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
- Fujimoto Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
- Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The study investigated real-world data of IRd therapy for RRMM patients, with a median age of 72 and most patients having IgG type. The median number of prior therapies was 4, mainly comprising bortezomib and lenalidomide-based regimens. Disease progression and adverse events were common reasons for treatment discontinuation. The study found that lenalidomide-refractory patients had significantly lower PFS than lenalidomide-sensitive patients, and the patients with IgG type had significantly better PFS and OS. Overall, IRd showed poor efficacy in non-IgG type and lenalidomide-refractory patients with RRMM in real clinical practice.
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate real-world data of ixazomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IRd) therapy for patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 122 patients treated with IRd at 16 centers from May 2017 to January 2019 by using the Kansai Myeloma Forum database. Result: At the start of IRd, the median age was 72 years, 66.7% of patients had IgG type, and the median number of prior therapies was 4, comprising bortezomib (85.4%) and lenalidomide (89.3%)-based regimens. Disease progression and adverse events accounted for treatment discontinuation in 46 and 32 patients, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was not reached, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.9 months. Sensitivity to bortezomib did not affect the PFS, whereas lenalidomide-refractory patients had significantly lower PFS than lenalidomide-sensitive patients, who were comparable to TOURMALINE-MM1 study. The patients with IgG type had significantly better PFS and OS than those with non-IgG type. Conclusion: This study presents the largest real-world data of patients treated with IRd in Asia. However, in real clinical practice, the patient background is different from the TOURMALINE-MM1 study, and IRd showed poor efficacy, especially in the non-IgG type and lenalidomide-refractory patients with RRMM.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available