4.5 Article

Auditory performance in a group of elderly patients after cochlear implantation

Journal

EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY
Volume 278, Issue 11, Pages 4295-4303

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06566-8

Keywords

Cochlear implantation; Elderly; Speech perception; Ageing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that elderly cochlear implant recipients showed significant improvement in monosyllabic word recognition test performance after implantation, with a negative correlation between auditory performance and age. Differences in performance were also significant between different age groups and genders in the study.
Purpose The retrospective case review investigated the effect of cochlear implantation in subjects aged 61 years or older with respect to their auditory performance. The study also analysed the effect of age on the performance, and it drew a comparison between the outcomes of older and younger adults. Methods The outcome in a group of 446 patients aged 61 to 89 years at the time of unilateral cochlear implantation was compared with the outcome in a group of 110 patients aged 17 to 42 years. Auditory performance was measured with open-set monosyllabic word testing and sentences in quiet and in noise. Results In the monosyllabic word recognition test, the group of older adults performed significantly better after cochlear implantation compared with their scores prior to implantation (p < 0.001; r = 0.59). Their auditory performance correlated negatively with their age. However, the correlation was of small strength. Significant differences in auditory performance were detected between sexagenarians and octogenarians (p < 0.001; r = 0.27). Additionally, a statistically significant difference was revealed between the groups of older and younger adults in the monosyllabic word test (p = 0.001; r = 0.15). Conclusion Elderly cochlear implant recipients can benefit significantly from cochlear implantation. Although higher age correlates negatively with auditory performance, its influence in the presented sample is small.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available