4.6 Article

Cryoablation vs. radiofrequency ablation of the atrioventricular node in patients with His-bundle pacing

Journal

EUROPACE
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 421-430

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/europace/euaa344

Keywords

His-bundle pacing; Atrioventricular node ablation; Cryoablation; Radiofrequency ablation

Funding

  1. GECOR foundation
  2. Amsterdam UMC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the procedural characteristics and outcomes of cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation for AVN ablation in patients with HBP. Cryoablation did not show any advantage over RFA and tended to require more redo procedures. Maintaining a distance of >= 6 mm from the His lead tip is recommended to avoid a rise in capture thresholds.
Aims Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the atrioventricular node (AVN) with His-bundle pacing (HBP) can cause rise in capture thresholds. Cryoablation (CRYO) may offer reversibility in case of threshold rise but has never been tested for AVN ablation in this setting. Our aim was to compare procedural characteristics and outcome of CRYO compared with RFA for AVN ablation in patients with HBP. Methods and results Forty-four patients with HBP underwent AVN ablation for an 'ablate and pace' indication. Cryoablation was performed in the first 22 patients and RFA in the following 22 patients. Procedural characteristics, success rates, and change in His capture thresholds were compared between groups. Distance from the ablation site to the His lead was measured using biplane fluoroscopy. Acute success was 100% with both strategies. Median procedural duration was significantly longer for CRYO 150 [interquartile range (IQR) 38-63] min} compared with RFA [36 (IQR, 30 41) min; P=0.027]. An acute threshold rise of >= 1 V was observed in four CRYO (one complete loss of capture) and three RFA patients (P =0.38), with all of the applications being within 6 mm of the His lead tip. During follow-up, nine patients had AVN re-conduction (six CRYO vs. three RFA; P=0.58), but only four patients required a redo procedure (all CRYO; P= 0.09). Conclusion Cryoablation does not offer any advantage over RFA for AVN ablation in patients with HBP and tended to require more redo procedures. If possible, a distance of >= 6 mm should be maintained from the His lead tip to avoid a rise in capture thresholds. [GRAPHICS] .

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available