4.8 Article

Aerosol Emissions of Amine-Based CO2 Absorption System: Effects of Condensation Nuclei and Operating Conditions

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 55, Issue 8, Pages 5152-5160

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c04630

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFB0603300]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the emission characteristics of AMP/MEA in post-combustion CO2 capture and found that aerosol emissions are significantly influenced by condensation nuclei and CO2 concentration within the absorber. An effective control strategy to reduce amine emissions involves nuclei pretreatment, operating optimization, and water scrubbing, leading to decreased MEA and AMP emissions.
Amine emissions from a post-combustion CO2 capture process can lead to solvent loss and serious environmental issues. The emission characteristics of amine mixtures and influencing factors are seldom reported. This work comprehensively investigated emissions of AMP (2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol)/MEA (monoethanolamine) from a 3.6 Nm(3)/h flue gas CO2 capture platform. The condensation nuclei in flue gas dominated the generation of amine aerosols and resulted in a heavy total amine loss of over 1400 mg/Nm(3), which is equivalent to 5.88 kg/t CO2 captured under the high nuclei concentration scenario. Inside the absorber, a higher CO2 concentration and lower lean solvent CO2 loading can significantly promote the growth of aerosols due to the intensive reaction of CO2 absorption. The maximum amine emissions were observed at 8-12 vol % CO2. The flue gas temperature and liquid/gas ratio had insignificant effects on aerosol emissions, while amine emissions after the absorber increased 340-500% as the lean solvent temperature increased from 30 to 50 degrees C. A synergistic control strategy of nuclei pretreatment, operating optimization, and water scrubbing can effectively reduce amine emissions to 4.0 mg/Nm(3) MEA and 8.3 mg/Nm(3) AMP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available