4.7 Article

Strengthened ocean-desert process in the North Pacific over the past two decades

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/abd96f

Keywords

North Pacific ocean desert; chlorophyll-a; ocean vertical structure; climate change; sea surface height

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [41876125]
  2. NSFC-Shandong Joint Fund [U1606404, U1906215]
  3. Chinese Minister of Science and Technology Fund [2019YFE0125000]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the North Pacific ocean desert has experienced oligotrophication and expansion over the past 20 years, which is related to warming upper oceans in most regions, but the Chl-a variations in the southwest area are linked to regional changes in sea surface heights. Additionally, the insignificant shift in the mean position of NPOD is likely controlled by the Pacific decadal oscillation processes.
North Pacific ocean desert (NPOD) refers to the subtropical North Pacific Ocean of low chlorophyll-a (Chl-a) concentrations, as the largest ocean desert globally. Studies have suggested a development of NPOD over recent decades based on limited evidences from in-field measurements and yet elusive mechanism. In this study, we characterize intensity, area and position of the NPOD from year 1998 to 2018, and investigate its control by the coherent climate processes, based on an available, longest satellite observations of Chl-a concentration. Our results suggested that NPOD oligotrophication and expansion processes were correlated with warming upper oceans in most part of the NPOD, except for the SW NPOD area where the Chl-a variations were linked with regional change in sea surface heights. Moreover, based on our analysis, insignificant shift but only NW-SE variability of the NPOD mean position was likely controlled by the Pacific decadal oscillation processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available