4.7 Article

Occurrence, distribution and human exposure of phthalic esters in road dust samples across China

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
Volume 191, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110222

Keywords

PAEs; Road dust; Occurrences; Spatial variation; Human exposure

Funding

  1. State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology [2018TS01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

203 road dust samples were conducted across China covering 28 provinces from January to February, 2016 to comprehensively investigates the occurrence, distribution and human exposure of 21 phthalic esters (PAEs). The concentration of E 21 PAEs in mad dust ranged from 2.3 to 531 mg/kg, with a mean concentration of 64.1 +/- 57.2 mg/kg. DEHP, DnBP and DiBP were the dominant components accounting for 63.3-97.9% (mean: 92.1%) of the Sigma(21)PAEs. Significant Pearson correlation (r = 0.51, p < 0.0001) between Sigma(21)PAEs concentrations and longitude demonstrated a distinguished geographical trend. Higher concentration of PAEs in sidewalk (SW) and trunk road (TR) may reflect influence of human activities such as shoe wear and traffic load. Significant differences were found among different human activities area (urban commercial, urban residential, and suburbs/rural). For total daily intake of Sigma(21)PAEs via street dust, children had the highest exposure risk followed by teenagers and adults with the median values of 160.8, 43.6, and 37.7 ng/kg-bw/day, respectively. The maximum exposure risk of PAEs calculated based on measurement and simulation were all far below reference values. The sensitivity analysis results demonstrated that concentrations, ingestion rate (IR) and fraction of PAEs absorbed in the skin (AF) were most important parameters on the assessment of exposure risk of PAEs via street dust. Specific parameters based on China and Chinses population is needed to obtain more reliable exposure risk via street dust.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available